Daily life in Pergamon during the Hellenistic period

A grounded look at households and workers in a steeply terraced Anatolian city of streets, workshops, markets, sanctuaries, and carefully managed water.

Pergamon stood on and around a high ridge above the Kaikos valley in western Anatolia, near modern Bergama in Türkiye. It grew rapidly as the center of the Attalid kingdom during the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE and passed into Roman control in 133 BCE. Monumental terraces crowned the hill, but most residents experienced the city through houses, stepped lanes, workshops, fountains, markets, gymnasia, and sanctuaries. Its population cannot be counted securely and was more varied than the surviving royal monuments suggest. Citizens, migrants, craftspeople, rural producers, servants, and enslaved people all sustained the capital. Archaeology reveals the built setting and many objects of daily use, while inscriptions clarify public institutions; the quieter routines of cooking, cleaning, child care, and repair must be reconstructed with appropriate caution.[1][2]

Housing and Living Spaces

Pergamon's housing followed the hill rather than a flat, regular grid. Archaeological survey has identified small-scale residential construction fitted to the natural contours, with traversable streets crossing the slopes and stair streets climbing between them. Retaining walls and artificial terraces created building plots where level ground was scarce. The upper citadel held royal residences, major sanctuaries, and administrative buildings, while dense neighborhoods spread across the slopes below. A climb between home, market, workshop, and sanctuary could therefore be a substantial part of an ordinary day. The steep setting also made the movement of building stone, water, firewood, food, and refuse unusually laborious.[1][2]

Hellenistic houses in the city ranged from modest groups of rooms to elite residences with courtyards, reception rooms, decorated plaster, and mosaic floors. Builders commonly combined local stone foundations with mudbrick or rubble walls, timber roof structures, terracotta tiles, and lime or clay plaster. Courtyards and light wells brought air and daylight into inward-facing rooms and provided places for food preparation, textile work, storage, and small repairs. Rooms were not necessarily assigned one permanent purpose. Bedding, braziers, baskets, low tables, and portable lamps allowed the same space to be used for work, meals, receiving visitors, and sleep. Shops or workshops could open toward a street while family activity continued farther inside.

Water shaped household organization. Cisterns and jars remained important even after Hellenistic engineers brought spring water toward the high city through long ceramic pipelines and a pressure system capable of crossing deep valleys. Public distribution did not remove the daily need to fetch, carry, and store water. Households also had to manage roof runoff, drains, hearth smoke, ash, broken pottery, and organic waste on restricted plots. Oil lamps lit interiors; charcoal braziers and hearths supplied localized heat; wooden doors, shutters, textiles, and plaster softened otherwise hard surfaces. Maintenance was continual: tiles slipped, mudbrick eroded, drains blocked, timber decayed, and terrace walls demanded inspection. Home life in Pergamon was consequently shaped as much by carrying, cleaning, and repair as by the city's celebrated architecture.[6]

Food and Daily Meals

Pergamon depended on its surrounding countryside. Surveys of the city's territory show a network of rural centers, villages, and farmsteads whose settlement patterns changed as the capital expanded. Farms in the Kaikos plain and nearby uplands supplied cereals, olives and oil, grapes and wine, pulses, fruit, vegetables, livestock, and timber or fuel. Not every product came from the immediate district: the route down the valley toward the Aegean and the port of Elaia connected the city to coastal trade. Market sellers, transporters, millers, and warehouse workers converted this regional production into an urban food supply.[3]

For most households, bread, grain porridge, or other cereal preparations formed the base of meals. Lentils and other pulses, olives, onions, leafy vegetables, figs, grapes, nuts, cheese, and preserved foods added variety. Fish could arrive from rivers, the coast, or salted trade, while sheep, goats, pigs, and cattle provided dairy products and meat. Meat was less routine than grain and could be especially visible at sacrifices and communal feasts, when portions were distributed after ritual. Wealth affected the fineness of flour, frequency of animal foods, range of imported ingredients, and quality of wine, oil, and serving vessels. Seasonal availability and harvest conditions mattered more than a fixed menu.

Food preparation required hours of repetitive labor. Grain was cleaned and ground with querns, dough mixed and baked, legumes soaked and boiled, and produce dried, pickled, or stored. Kitchens and courtyard work areas used stone mortars, iron knives, bronze or wooden utensils, ceramic cooking pots, braziers, ovens, amphoras, and storage jars. Pergamene workshops supplied abundant tableware and drinking cups, including mold-made relief vessels used in more formal settings.[4][9] Ordinary meals could be shared from common dishes, whereas wealthier households arranged banquets with couches, individual vessels, servants, and entertainment. Wine was normally mixed with water. Markets and festivals also created demand for prepared food, but daily food security still depended on household stores, reliable water, fuel, and the largely unrecorded work of women, dependents, and enslaved workers.

Work and Labor

Pergamon's growth created work on a scale unusual for the surrounding region. Quarry workers, masons, plasterers, carpenters, tile makers, haulers, metalworkers, painters, and mosaicists built and maintained terraces, houses, stoas, sanctuaries, roads, and water installations. Royal and civic projects employed highly skilled designers as well as large numbers of carriers and laborers whose names rarely survive. Construction was not a single phase: walls settled, painted surfaces faded, roofs leaked, and public buildings required cleaning and repair. The steep city multiplied transport tasks, since animals and carts could use only some routes and many loads had to be carried up stairs.

Workshops produced necessities as well as display objects. Potters made cooking wares, storage jars, lamps, tableware, figurines, roof tiles, and molds; research indicates strong regional production for Pergamon's large demand for fired-clay goods.[5][9] Bronze workers cast vessels, fittings, tools, and small figures. Stonecutters shaped architectural pieces and inscriptions, leatherworkers made sandals and harness, and textile workers spun, wove, dyed, and mended cloth. Some crafts occupied specialized workshops, but production also took place in houses, where storefront, workroom, storage space, and family life could overlap. Apprentices learned by observation and practice within households or under established artisans.

The city also supported teachers, scribes, book workers, accountants, musicians, performers, priests, attendants, market officials, guards, and workers attached to the gymnasium and sanctuaries. Pergamon's library and court attracted scholars, but copying and caring for scrolls required less celebrated hands to prepare writing surfaces, ink, labels, shelves, and bindings.[4] In the markets, retailers and brokers weighed goods, exchanged coin, arranged credit, and kept records. Porters, muleteers, and boat crews connected those markets to farms and the coast.

Agricultural labor remained fundamental even for city dwellers. Rural households plowed, sowed, pruned vines and olives, tended animals, harvested, threshed, pressed, and transported produce. Urban families might hold land outside the walls or maintain kinship ties with villages. Within every social level, cooking, water carrying, cleaning, child care, weaving, and storage management consumed time without necessarily producing wages or public recognition. Free workers, resident foreigners, dependents, and enslaved people could perform similar tasks under very different legal conditions. Occupation, gender, age, citizenship, and household status all affected who controlled the product of that labor.

Social Structure

Pergamon was both a royal residence and a Greek-style polis. The court and its associates controlled exceptional resources, while the citizen body maintained assemblies, magistracies, decrees, cults, and traditions of public honor. These spheres overlapped but were not equal. Inscriptions show citizens and civic benefactors negotiating visibility within a city whose most conspicuous spaces emphasized dynastic power.[7] Below the narrow royal and civic elite stood a varied population of artisans, merchants, farmers, teachers, performers, servants, migrants, and enslaved people. Wealth, citizenship, family connections, education, legal status, and access to patrons shaped a person's opportunities.

The household was the basic social and economic unit. Marriage linked property and kin groups, children learned status and skills within the family, and older relatives could remain part of a multi-generational home. Women were largely excluded from formal political citizenship but were central to household management, textile production, food preparation, religious practice, and family property. Evidence is strongest for prosperous families and public male roles, so the experiences of poor residents, migrants, and enslaved people remain harder to recover. Enslaved workers served in homes, workshops, agriculture, and public or royal establishments; their labor could resemble that of free workers even though they lacked control over their movement and legal standing.

Public institutions organized age, education, and status. Pergamon's three-terraced gymnasium offered exercise, instruction, bathing, cult, and sociability to male groups, but participation carried costs and was not equally open to everyone. Oil, water, fuel, teachers, and festivals depended on public funds and wealthy benefactors.[8] The theater brought large audiences together for drama and other performances, while agoras provided settings for exchange, announcements, and civic display. Such spaces helped residents recognize themselves as members of a city, even as seating, clothing, leisure time, and access revealed differences among them.

Religion entered the home as well as monumental sanctuaries. Excavations in the residential city recovered thousands of terracotta fragments, many probably once used as household objects, dedications, or workshop products. Images of Kybele, Aphrodite, Eros, Dionysiac figures, actors, and masks point toward domestic devotion, festival culture, entertainment, and local demand.[5] People also met through neighborhood obligations, funerals, sacrifices, processions, and shared water points. Social life therefore joined family loyalty, civic identity, patronage, worship, education, and work rather than taking place only in palaces or formal institutions.

Tools and Technology

Pergamon's most striking everyday technology was its water system. Cisterns gathered local supplies, while long pipelines brought spring water from the hills. By the 2nd century BCE, a pressure line used closely fitted pipe sections and the principle of an inverted siphon to carry water across a valley toward the elevated city.[1][6] Settling tanks, channels, outlets, drains, and repair access were as important as the dramatic pressure crossing. The system supported fountains, major institutions, building work, and some domestic demand, but residents still relied on jars and human labor for the final movement of water.

Most tools were smaller and repeatedly repaired. Farmers used iron sickles, hoes, pruning hooks, axes, and plow fittings; builders used hammers, chisels, drills, levels, measuring cords, levers, and lifting gear. Potters combined wheels, molds, kilns, slips, and stamps, while metalworkers used furnaces, crucibles, molds, tongs, and files. Textile work relied on spindles, spindle whorls, looms, weights, needles, and shears. In kitchens, querns and mortars reduced grain and seasonings; ceramic pots controlled heat; amphoras and jars stored liquids and dry goods. Lamps, locks, keys, scales, weights, coins, seals, pens, ink, and scrolls supported movement after dark, household security, trade, and administration. Terracing itself was a technology: carefully bonded retaining walls converted a steep ridge into stable streets, buildings, and public platforms.

Clothing and Materials

Most clothing was made from wool or linen, with leather used for footwear, belts, bags, and protective items. The common garments of the Greek-speaking Hellenistic world included sewn or pinned tunics and larger wrapped cloaks. In Pergamon these broad forms existed alongside Anatolian habits and the practical demands of season, occupation, and travel. A laborer needed a short, secured garment and durable sandals; a traveler or herder valued a heavier cloak; prosperous residents could wear finer fabric, stronger dyes, jewelry, and carefully arranged folds. Pins, brooches, belts, hair ornaments, earrings, rings, and pendants helped mark age, gender, wealth, and occasion.

Cloth represented stored labor. Fleece had to be washed and prepared, flax processed, fibers spun, threads woven, and finished fabric cut or draped, sewn, dyed, cleaned, and mended. Much spinning and weaving could occur within households, although specialist production and market exchange also supplied an urban capital. Warp-weighted looms could produce plain cloth as well as more complex weaves, and dyes gave garments a wider range than the bare stone of surviving sculpture suggests.[10] Fine textiles and gold ornament belonged to elite display, but ordinary garments were valuable enough to be patched, re-cut for smaller wearers, or reused as wrappings and rags. Laundry, airing, stain removal, and protection from moths formed recurring household tasks. Clothing was therefore both a visible language of status and a practical material economy linking shepherds, flax growers, dyers, traders, leatherworkers, and family labor.

Daily life in Hellenistic Pergamon unfolded between an imposing capital and the ordinary work that sustained it. Residents climbed its streets, carried water, prepared grain, tended shops and workshops, maintained terraces, joined household cults, and relied on farms beyond the city. The monuments reveal concentrated wealth and ambition; houses, pipes, pottery, tools, and terracottas reveal a broader urban community adapting its routines to a steep landscape.

References

UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Pergamon and its Multi-Layered Cultural Landscape. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1457/
Pirson, Felix. “Pergamon – Bericht über die Arbeiten in der Kampagne 2012.” Archäologischer Anzeiger, 2013. https://publications.dainst.org/journals/aa/article/view/1835
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Rural Cities, Villages, and Farmsteads in the Chora of Hellenistic Pergamon. https://www.en.ag.geschichte.uni-muenchen.de/research/chora_pergamon/index.html
The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Pergamon and the Hellenistic Kingdoms of the Ancient World: Exhibition Galleries, 2016. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2016/pergamon/exhibition-galleries
Kielau, Sven. Terrakotten aus Pergamon: Tonfiguren und -objekte aus der Wohnstadt am Südhang der Akropolis und von weiteren Fundorten. Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, 2018. https://doi.org/10.34780/pf.v17i0.1000
Garbrecht, Jürgen D., and Günther Garbrecht. “Water Supply Challenges and Solutions of the Ancient City of Pergamon.” Proceedings of the 2005 Oklahoma Water Conference, 2005. https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=184684
Bielfeldt, Ruth. “Wo nur sind die Bürger von Pergamon? Eine Phänomenologie bürgerlicher Unscheinbarkeit im städtischen Raum der Königsresidenz.” Istanbuler Mitteilungen, vol. 60, pp. 117–201. https://doi.org/10.34780/x4vdn834
Kaye, Noah. “Hastening to the Gymnasium.” In The Attalids of Pergamon and Anatolia: Money, Culture, and State Power. Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009279567.006
Keweloh-Kaletta, Anneke. “Pergamon, Türkei: Keramik in Pergamon durch die Lupe betrachtet. Die Arbeiten der Jahre 2020 bis 2023.” e-Forschungsberichte des DAI, 2025. https://doi.org/10.34780/602ey623
Hellenic Centre for Research and Conservation of Archaeological Textiles. Production Techniques. https://artextiles.org/en/content/production-techniques